I begin this weekend, intending to treat it
as a concept design submission. The goal is to have half a dozen sheets of
drawings (plans, elevations, sections) several perspective views and a tidied up
model with a fairly consistent level of development across the whole building. Let’s
see what happens.
Thursday evening found me sketching ideas
for vault family strategies on my phone. I knew that the curved ambulatories
around the East end would be tricky but I was optimistic.
Friday morning revealed serious issues with
the existing setting out. This would have to be resolved before embarking on
the vaults. First thing to do is look more carefully. Peel off another layer of
the onion. There are radial alignments where the flying buttresses sit. These
were not working.
Also there should be curved sections of
wall between the arches of the outer row, not free standing columns like the
two inner rings. I decided to use a new background image. Maybe this plan was
more accurate. Certainly easier to read.
The next detour along my weekend journey was
distracting but positive. Conversations with potential collaborators, which I
managed to get moved to Slack eventually. Four way conversations in full swing
by Saturday.
I realised that there was a double grid at the transition from straight to curved, an offset of about 1.5m This was crucial in getting the radial alignments to work.
Along the sides of the nave I have columns
nested into the arch families. This works well, but around the curve the
columns need to be independent in order to fine tune their position and
alignment.
All this took time. The second pass through
the model can be frustrating. Work proceeds more slowly than during the first
roughing out. But the complexity of the apse Geometry is quite fascinating. I
would love to compare with other cathedrals. I wonder if someone has done this
already.
Here there are 5 bays in the inner ring, 10
in the middle ring, and 13 in the outer. The first two rings are evenly spaced.
But the third has grouped arches. This allows for the thickness of the hefty walls
that anchor the flying buttresses.
So on the outer edge you have vaults that
link 3 arches on one side to two on the other. Creating a sort of zigzag
pattern. This seemed like a suitable challenge for Saturday.
I
tried the swept blend approach that had worked well for the radial vaults high
above the altar. Actually, these need to be reworked now because the offset has
disturbed their regularity. The Leica TruView site was really helpful in
visualising the context here. It really captures
the spirit of Gothic architecture: bundles of circular ribs curving
upwards. The tricky part of the Swept
Blend in this situation is the way the void extrusion cuts at an oblique angle
to the second profile.
Couldn’t get the swept blend to work for
the zigzag. Too much irregularity. Can’t get the ends of the vaults to match
the arches. So I opted for Point World, and lofted surfaces. Took a long time and
the fit is still far from perfect. But I learnt a lot about the subtlety of
these spaces. This is all manually
created with an in-place mass. You could
thicken the surface up using wall/roof by surface, but I don’t think the
junction at the ridges will work out too well.
The alternative would be to use a closed profile for the loft, instead
of a line.
Looking from above you get a feel for the
nature of the challenge. There are five
wedge shaped portions of vaulting between the zigzag of the ribs. The middle one is symmetrical, but the others
are skewed. It’s just the way things
work when you divide the space up like that.
You can see the small gaps down the sides where the vaults meet the
ribs.
Of course, it’s always possible to generate
a softer image that disguises the minor imperfections that leave me
dissatisfied with my efforts so far. “Fake
News” you may say, but I think it’s always useful to step back from time to
time and view your work from a metaphorical distance. Between the groups of 3 arches there is a
wider section of wall. The round column
is pushed a little further forward and there is a flat splay leading back to
the arch. There should be a horizontal
line where the vault meets this splay.
Not happening. Something wrong with
the geometry but I’m not sure how to fix it.
There are 3 types of zigzag vault. I’ve
done one instance of the pink type. One out of three. There are two different
types that connect two arches to one (green and blue) Looks like I’m going to
pass all these on to Alfredo now. Big sigh of relief.
Alfredo very generously offered to host the
model on his BIM360 site. Ideally I
would have liked Autodesk to host the model, but those discussions have not yet
come to a conclusion and there are several people keen to contribute, so we
went ahead. There will need to be discussions
about how we coordinate our efforts.
From previous experience with Project Soane, a naming system for the various
elements will be helpful, so that will probably be my initial focus next
weekend.
After uploading the model on Sunday
afternoon, I had time for a bit more modelling.
Some adjustments to the main vaults over the choir and the apse. Not complete, but enough to establish how the
double grid is accommodated. Then I
roughly sketched in the intermediate flying buttresses around the apse. This is another example of a “3 bays into 2”
situation. So you get two buttresses
converging to meet at their highest point.
I have made them straight in plan at present, but actually they need to
do a bit of a “dog-leg”
So we have a lot of fascinating challenges,
and a small team of experienced Reviteers.
Let’s see what happens over the next few weeks.
There's nothing like a good collaboration.
There's nothing like a good collaboration.
I want to join this project so bad :-)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete