This is scary. Eleven years
ago I was on my way to New Zealand for the first time, perhaps the only
time. I was full of hope. Visiting my sister and speaking at a BIM
conference. I wanted to share my belief that Revit is a thinking tool,
like a pencil. That we can use it for self reflection.
I
am older now and conscious that time is running out. But I remain proud
of this work, tentative though it is. I attempted a study of three
famous office buildings, very different in form, style and context.
I
have been told that my conference papers are not commercial enough. But
isn't that the point? Isn't there a place for one out of thirty
presenters to explore BIM as a tool for asking the bigger questions?
Don't we have a duty to future generations as well as to our clients?
I
am a great believer in visual thinking. People often tell me that there
are better tools than Revit for "modeling something like that" But this
also misses the point. I want to humanise our modern digital tools, to
connect them to the grand tradition of visual thinking from cave art, to
Leonardo, to Cezanne or Picasso. (not forgetting Gordon Cullen or Leon
Krier)
Eleven years is a long time. I
don't go to these conferences any more. I'm trying to just reflect on
the winding road my life has followed and to share what I can for future
generations. It's not earth shattering, but maybe it will be useful to a
few bright souls looking for a different approach.
One last post about Volterra
(for now) I chose this church as my Revit modelling exercise to be my
original contribution to the workshop. All the sessions and practical
experiences were wonderful but I am never going to go round laser
scanning on my own. Recognising where best to direct your efforts is an
important skill.
Dave Dreffs helped me
to convert multiple photos into a usable mesh which I then processed to
remove edges and embedded in a side altar family. It's a shield motif.
Not amenable to native Revit modelling. Doesn't show up in these images.
I did the smoothing and embedding back in Dubai.
Mapping
the city and abstracting into diagrams was a multi-dimensional
exercise. Topography surface from GIS. Sorting my photos and grouping by
district. Inventing those districts for my own purposes. Linking point
clouds. Struggling with levels. Searching for appropriate levels of
detail with extrusions. Starting in-place and choosing when to covert
into loadable families.
All
those dimensions fused together into a learning experience for me. The
models were later handed on to Paul Aubin and may have helped the team
as they incrementally build up their digital representations of a
wonderful historic city.
Paul
has also done some great Revit modelling of individual buildings. I'm a
little out of touch with the latest work but it seems to be maturing
and integrating very nicely. Food and drink being consumed in wonderful
surroundings for sure.
Memories to treasure.
Casa del Fascio and Lever
House. Two fascinating office buildings. One from just before WW2 the
other just after. Both modernist visions of a rational, technological
future.
Terragni's modelling of the
four different facades of his courtyard block crackles with tight
creative energy. But there are many more secrets waiting when you start
to model a building like this with a tool like Revit. So many hours
spent puzzling over things I didn't quite understand. Sadly I will
probably never visit this building now. Life is a wonderful gift. Accept
the hand that is dealt to you, and do something special with it.
Lever
House, I have seen. Visiting New York when my daughter lived in New
Jersey. I saw images of this building as a teenager when I was first
exploring the idea of being an architect. It's a blend of idealism and
pragmatism that seems typically American. And it's almost exactly the
same age as me.
The curtain wall is a
fascinating hodge-podge. How rapidly that technology has developed as
specialist firms entered an ever expanding market. I exported a DWFX
study file of a portion of the framing and facade system that was part
of my presentation and has been shared with a few architecture students
since then.
According
to British art critic Reyner Banham in 1962, Lever House "gave
architectural expression to an age just as the age was being born"... so
says Wikipedia. Banham was my history of architecture professor at the
Bartlett in 1970.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI wonder, you wrote "I am older now and conscious that time is running out."
You have created a lot of very unique digital things. Where does all this go when we're done with it?
I'm an older semi-retired Architect person myself. I'm not sure much of my professional work is really worth preserving, it's mostly mercantile in nature. Honestly most of it should be tossed it's not of any consequence to anyone.
But you've made many very beautiful digital things, I see them on your website which I've been admiring for many years. I'm sure there's much more that you've got filed away. Where do these digital creations go when we're gone? It's something new to think about, in the old days, you relations might unknowingly toss all your old drawings in a trash dumpster when the time comes.
Ironically, we all police our digital stuff when we're alive, because reasons. But these digital creations also have an unknown expiration date. Look at Revit, who will be able to open your amazing precious revit files in 50 years?
Pardon me for being so personal, but do you ever wonder what you want to do with your digital work after you're gone?
I donated some historical family photos to a local musem recenty - They were physical objects and many were quite beautiful in your hand. But these digital things, they are not tangible, the volume is increasing all the time and a lot of it will be lost.
This is an interesting question, one of my late friends got involved in a project to preserve old digital practice files of a well known architect for the CCA (Canadian Centre for Architecture) in Montreal. He recieved floppy disk and other artefacts and had to ask himself that exact question. We have digital remains, what do we do with it when we expect it to be of value?
DeleteIf I compare it to the physical crap we amass during our lives, I'd say, if you did not need it in the past few years, get rid of it. Do not waste cloud server storage or conmputer ressources on that. That being said, I tend to archive my stuff on a website.
Nice post
ReplyDelete