I just want to share some of the Revit-based work that has been coming out of our office recently. At GAJ we have been using Revit since release 7, installing our first copies 8 years ago. The journey has been quite challenging, with more than a few twists & turns, but over the past couple of years BIM has become the dominant methodology in the office.
The images are taken from 3 quite different projects. One is an art gallery which re-interprets a heritage area in a modern manner. Construction drawings were done using Revit, and the project is now on complete and ready for occupation. This is a type of work for which we are well known in the region.
There is a perception that Revit is a documentation tool & other softwares are more effective during the early phases of the design process. Wise warriors choose their battles, so I kept my protests down to a token mumble. The first priority was to build a strong core of experienced users.
Of late though we have been using Revit much earlier in the process & the second project here is a competition submission put together in a few days by a small team. This work has made quite a splash in the office and has gone a long way towards convincing the remaining sceptics.
The third project is the only one where I was directly involved. It's more of a bread & butter project: a concept design report for a complex of 9 buildings produced by a small team working under a tight programme. The client has already remarked that he is impressed with the amount & quality of work produced.
We used a couple of techniques here that I will discuss in a separate post: attempts to use BIM in a "diagrammatic" mode. This allowed us to resolve basic space-planning issues before embarking full-blown BIM, using "real building elements" (walls, doors, rooms) But what I want to show here is just the end product.
We were able to show that Revit can produce attractive imagery, appropriate to the stage of work & effective in it's ability to convey our design intent to the client.
Along the way I also revisited our furniture library & produced some simple, "generic" families that help to keep the presentation style clean & focussed. We don't want to distract the client with irrelevant detail. That's one of the reasons that architects go for a minimalistic style of drawing.
Far too often BIM looks clunky because users haven't figured out how to achieve that lean & hungry look. That's what we were aiming at here, and I think we have made good progress. But at the same time (and with very little extra effort) the appendix to the report is packed with conventional drawing sheets: fully coordinated plans, elevations & sections that match the simper representation shown earlier.
The images are taken from 3 quite different projects. One is an art gallery which re-interprets a heritage area in a modern manner. Construction drawings were done using Revit, and the project is now on complete and ready for occupation. This is a type of work for which we are well known in the region.
There is a perception that Revit is a documentation tool & other softwares are more effective during the early phases of the design process. Wise warriors choose their battles, so I kept my protests down to a token mumble. The first priority was to build a strong core of experienced users.
Of late though we have been using Revit much earlier in the process & the second project here is a competition submission put together in a few days by a small team. This work has made quite a splash in the office and has gone a long way towards convincing the remaining sceptics.
We used a couple of techniques here that I will discuss in a separate post: attempts to use BIM in a "diagrammatic" mode. This allowed us to resolve basic space-planning issues before embarking full-blown BIM, using "real building elements" (walls, doors, rooms) But what I want to show here is just the end product.
We were able to show that Revit can produce attractive imagery, appropriate to the stage of work & effective in it's ability to convey our design intent to the client.
Along the way I also revisited our furniture library & produced some simple, "generic" families that help to keep the presentation style clean & focussed. We don't want to distract the client with irrelevant detail. That's one of the reasons that architects go for a minimalistic style of drawing.
Far too often BIM looks clunky because users haven't figured out how to achieve that lean & hungry look. That's what we were aiming at here, and I think we have made good progress. But at the same time (and with very little extra effort) the appendix to the report is packed with conventional drawing sheets: fully coordinated plans, elevations & sections that match the simper representation shown earlier.
It's encouraging to see the construction industry adopt ecological practices as a resident of London.
ReplyDeleteSustainable construction in London, ON
Sharing this evolution and the work that's come out of it at the BIM Show Live will be an excellent opportunity to showcase the progress and experiences. I can recommend you a store that has everything and they have discount wholesale
ReplyDelete